Saying less than 1% of editing does NOT requrire a human is NOT contradicting what I just said. Yet if AVID does it, you think its the decline of the human editors? Stop, please.
AFTER EFFECTS, PREMIERE (via 3rd party plugins) are offering this as are the top-tier decent consumer stuff (Sony Vegas type software). AVID should have this capability for the specific situations I am mentioning. And again, this is simply for social media. You are proposing that for each one of these mini-clips I do 10-15 mins of human editing and spend 50+ hours to make my batch of 100's of social media clips.įASTCUT could do this is in maybe 90% less time. I want to make 100's of short sequence 10 secs to 30 secs in length to post on social media. I also have a project where I need to make 100's of social media post from approxmiately 500+ clips I own copyright too/shot myself. I would like to throw them all in randomly into a sequence, each clip showing for 10 seconds (I know I can drag them all in, set in/out, etc but this will not randomly add them and will put them in an specific order which is exactly what I don't want as then similar photos are shown one after another, I want to make a long, random video presentation of my travel photos with said 1000-1500 photos randomly shown. You are grossly overexaggerating.įor example, I am finally finishing going through 15,000+ travel photos of the last 20+ years and putting the best 1000-1500 through lightroom.
Again, for the third time, there are very specific limited uses that would in no way, NONE, contribute to the decline of human editors. Your reply is not understanding what I am asking and not factual in the least and not helping this discussion.
#Magix fastcut not recognizing files software#
Please check out the software I mentioned first. We're not next, but we're also not invulnerable. To them we're all just negative numbers on a balance sheet, and they're much less interested in our editing talents than they are in how much more money their company could make if they replaced us with software.Īnd if you think that's hyperbole, they're already replacing the customer service reps, food service workers, security guards, train drivers, and a bunch of other jobs that no longer require a human. There's not one of them that knows the difference between a film editor, a news editor, or a YouTube editor. There is most definitely a bean-counter at some corporation somewhere that is salivating at the idea of replacing human editors with AI, and if you think there's not you're naive. What you are arguing for is the next step on a path that ends with all of us out of work. Not today they can't, but right now Google and Facebook use AI to make movies out of users' uploaded photos and videos. they can abolsutely NOT in anyway whatsoever edit a narrative film/show.
possible?ī.) insert randomly clips selected into a sequence with edit points (say, on the beat of music for example. Also, what if I wanted to put 100+ still pictures back to back but RANDOMLY do this. So, could I do either one of the followingĪ.) insert clips back to back, whether whole or in part, to a sequence of X length. However, both have seriously limitations. Is there anyway to do this in the avid?įYI 0 magisto will, using a cloud interface, put some (almost never all) into a sequence of X length.įastCut allows you to make a "sequence" with preset edit points.
There is software out there (Magisto online or MAGIX FastCut) that will randomly (and rather well with some AI), automatically do this. I want to create a ton of social media sequences from 200+ clips.
0 kommentar(er)
